Saturday, April 02, 2016

Excellent “Is Amanda Knox Guilty?” Report By Vogt & Russell Close To 100,000 YouTube Views

Posted by The TJMK Main Posters

This is just under one hour long - and very good. Viewer numbers just passed the 99,500 mark. About 1,000 a week.


Posted by The TJMK Main Posters on 04/02/16 at 01:09 PM in News media & moviesGreat reportingMedia news


Comments

Just an observation. I have checked Knox blog again which I do on several occasions. If you read the comments of support you will notice that the meter and the vocabulary are all the same. There is a rhythm to speech which transmits itself into the written word.

If you read Knox prose, such as they are, then read the comments there is only one conclusion. ie They were all written by two people or less. Knox herself has written glowing garbage on her own behalf. This indicates that once again her circle of supporters are growing ever less.

Of course in order to keep what amounts to a dumb written piece on page six she has to embroider her own shallow self image. Check it out for yourself you will see what I mean.

Posted by Grahame Rhodes on 04/02/16 at 01:27 PM | #

AK: 36 mins 30 secs “I was ‘almost’ convinced that I’d met him” (Patrick Lumumba).  Yes, Amanda it’s hard to deliver such a massive lie.

I find the look on AK’s face at 12 mins and 46 secs v revealing (like a real nasty piece of work).  The polar opposite to the way she has tried to portray herself since.

It’s a very good programme. But horrible to watch both AK and RS with their narcissistic looks (in courtroom).

Their continual denial, ergo torture, to so many is despicable.

Posted by DavidB on 04/02/16 at 03:51 PM | #

Hi Grahame

We have long been told that the entire Mellas family spends hours at night fanning out under false names across the internet.

Take a look at the language of the seriously dishonest and defamatory “Nancy Parks” and “Nancy Parker” in his/her/their several hundred misleading comments here?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=joZV0XARmvA

Are “Nancy Parks” and “Nancy Parker” in fact them? Anyone who wants to correct any of the comments there might also post them here. Feel free to post these:

a massive coverup by local police

Zero coverup. For coverup read the 400 plus lies in the Knox book and the Interrogation Hoax series here.

Mignini and others were leaking lies to the press

Care to name ONE? In Dec 2007 Mignini gave Knox a remarkable opportunity to get off; instead she collapsed and began to cry.

some independent experts came forward that totally dispelled the evidence

Really? “Independent” experts not on payroll or mafia stooges? They “totally” dispelled all of this?

http://truejustice.org/ee/index.php?/evidenceoverview

They couldn’t be bothered recording the interrogations

There were zero “interrogations” as Knox’s own scribblings at the time proved.

http://www.truejustice.org/ee/index.php?/tjmk/comments/the_knox_interrogation_hoax_12_proof_released/

the footprints were all Rudy’s and proven so

Several prints probably of Knox and one probably of Sollecito, in bare feet, were there. Guede was never in bare feet. 

there isn’t one shred of evidence that puts her in the bloody crime scene.

Yes there is. See this.

http://truejustice.org/ee/index.php?/tjmk/comments/beyond_massei_on_the_seemingly_insuperable_mixed_blood_evidence/

Posted by Peter Quennell on 04/02/16 at 04:28 PM | #

The documentary is excellent.

When it first came on YouTube, I was one of the first to comment. There ensued a running battle between the many faces of Nancy Parker, a dotty old Swede called Calmarena and me for well over a year. Eventually I gave up and deleted my profile which removed all my comments. I just felt unclean having any discourse at all with these people.

Talking of unclean, I see young Master Geude has an up and running Facebook page which he comments on regularly; the latest within the last couple of days. In Italian, of course, so I haven’t google translated it as I’m sure it’s more of the same that we saw in his recent interview.

Posted by davidmulhern on 04/02/16 at 08:36 PM | #

davidmulhern,

Nancy Parker is seemingly a mafia dupe. I posted on YouTube to point that out with the proof.

Keep watching on YouTube to see if she figures out a way to distance herself from that!!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=joZV0XARmvA

Posted by Peter Quennell on 04/04/16 at 10:57 AM | #

Some 36 hours later, viewers of the video are over 100,000, and headed for 100,100. Well done Vogt & Russell. Deserved.

Posted by Peter Quennell on 04/04/16 at 11:18 AM | #

I found your comment Pete.

It’s caused a minor flurry of excitement within the ranks of the pro Knox myopic morons.

Nancy does say that even if the Sollecitos have Mafia connections, “what does that have to do with this case?”

The force is not strong at all with our Nancy. Not strong at all!

Posted by davidmulhern on 04/04/16 at 02:31 PM | #

Yes Well you always find people like Nancy Parker et-al. But then these people are just head lice. In other words just another feeder at the Knox trough. Too bad for them the trough is as empty as their rhetoric. Retribution is coming to Amanda Knox and it’s not going to be pretty.

Posted by Grahame Rhodes on 04/04/16 at 06:23 PM | #

Hi davidmulhern and Grahame Rhodes

Know your enemy, right?!  We always make sure of that; we try to be watchful on all fronts and to report everything that wont hamper justice.

In contrast not only dont “they” know their enemy (they resolutely refuse to read TJMK or the PMFs, even our purely factual translations).

Its now obvious that they dont even know their “friends”.

Oggi’s trial was the subject of the previous post. Do they really think that Oggi excerpted Knox’s book only because of her sheer amazingness?

No. In fact Oggi has long carried water for the mafias and corrupt politicians seeking to take Italian judges and prosecutors down a peg.

That is why Oggi was so quickly charged and why prosecutors have been blasting it.

In many of our posts and comments we have pointed our how Judges Marasca and Bruno ended up on the Supreme Court’s Fifth Panel.

And how similar “political appointees” from Naples etc will never again make it to the Supreme Court.

Posted by Peter Quennell on 04/05/16 at 02:59 AM | #

Hi peter Is Bongiorno one of these?

Posted by Grahame Rhodes on 04/05/16 at 04:44 AM | #

Fellow traveler? Well Bongiorno (who is from Palermo in Sicily) has made her share of fees out of defending those accused of unsavory ties, she first gained prominence that way. (Although she claimed an ultimate win in the Andreotti case in fact the statute of limitations ran out.)

Judge Nencini in Florence in 2014 was not too impressed with or intimidated by her yelling at him, but Judges Marasca & Bruno in 2015 gave her 3-4 times the amount of time defined in a statute to make her case to them, and then largely reflected it in their report.

Posted by Peter Quennell on 04/05/16 at 04:51 AM | #

The BBC’s “Is Amanda Knox Guilty” YouTube is now a no-show at top here, but it is now available on Amazon Video, I’m waiting on a link eight now.

Posted by Peter Quennell on 02/27/17 at 01:40 PM | #


Make a comment

If you are reading this please log in to post a comment.

Smileys



Where next:

Click here to return to The Top Of The Front Page

Or to next entry How Knox’s Tide Of Malicious Demonization Now Threatens Real Pushback #3

Or to previous entry On April 26 Possible Sentences For Oggi For Publishing Defamations By Knox