Overview: This page exclusively covers the 500 or so zombie lies in Knox's English-only 2013 book. See this page for Knox's zombie lies to media and paying groups.
Category: Explanation
1. How Knox Herself Provides Proofs Of Lies - Series Overview
Posted by Chimera
Reason whythere’s no similar shot of RS showing warmth to AK
1. Series Context
Knox lies?! Anyone who reads here for a while is left in no doubt of that.
Anyone who watched the trial in Italian concluded that. Even her own lawyers concluded that. They publicly requested in 2008 that she stop all her lying.
Numerous sworn witnesses in court, with no dog at all in this fight, contradicted her. Easily identifiable lies now number up in the thousands. They tend to be malicious (how she hates others), and they tend to be narcissistic (how she loves herself).
To close case-watchers they stand out a mile.
And yet amazingly more than four out of every five critics who reviewed her book on the Amazon site accepted what she said, word for word. And more than four out of every five critics who reviewed the Netflix report accepted what she said, word for word.
Past posts and series addressed Knox lies at (1) the time of arrest and 2007 hearings, (2) the 2008 hearings, (3) Knox at trial, (4) Knox in prison, (5) Knox at the Hellman appeal, (6) Knox back in Seattle, when (7) she wrote her book, (8) Knox emailing Judge Nencini, (9) Knox in recent paid presentations, and (10) Knox on US media and especially Netflix (with more to follow).
This further 8-part series puts (2) above along side (7) above to show further how it is a really, really bad idea to believe anything at all in Knox’s book.
Knox very often lies by omission - she leaves out numerous key facts - and her shadow writer and editors seemingly enable that. I will address some of Knox’s key omissions in this first post.
What Was Omitted From The Book
(1) Knox At Trial In 2009”¦
Here is Knox’s entire text of a full two days at court on June 12-13, 2009 in Waiting to be Heard (Chapter 26, Pages 324-327).
“Your Honor, I’d like to speak in Italian,” I said politely. I didn’t think about whether it would work or whether it was a good idea. All I could think was, I have been waiting my turn for nearly two years. This is it!
At least prison life had been good for my language skills.
I was relieved to be able to speak directly to the jury. The hard part wasn’t the Italian; it was being an active listener for hours at a time, making sure I heard the questions correctly and that my questioners didn’t push me around.
Pacelli tried to insinuate that I’d come up with Patrick’s name on my own in my interrogation. “No,” I said. “They put my cell phone in front of me, and said, ‘Look, look at the messages. You were going to meet someone.’ And when I denied it they called me a ‘stupid liar.’ From then on I was so scared. They were treating me badly, and I didn’t know why.
“It was because the police misunderstood the words ‘see you later.’ In English, it’s not taken literally. It’s just another way of saying ‘good-bye.’ But the police kept asking why I’d made an appointment to meet Patrick. ‘Are you covering for Patrick?’ they demanded. ‘Who’s Patrick?”’
We went over how I found the room for rent in the villa, my relationship with Meredith, my history with alcohol and marijuana, and what happened on November 2. The prosecution and the civil parties were confrontational. I was able to respond. It took two exhausting days, and there were a few questions I couldn’t answer.
I’d purposely tried to forget the emotional pain of the slap to my head. Other memories had become muddled by time. For instance, I remembered calling my mom only once after Meredith’s body was found, but cell phone records indicated that I’d made three calls while Raffaele and I were standing in my driveway.
During my testimony, I was clear. I never stumbled or stalled. I just said, This is what happened. This is what I went through.
I relaxed a little when it was Luciano’s turn to question me.
“During the interrogation, there were all these people around me,” I said. “In front and behind me, yelling, threatening, and then there was a policewoman behind me who did this.”
I slapped my own head to demonstrate.
“One time, two times?” Luciano asked.
“Two times,” I said. “The first time I did this.”
I dropped my head down as if I’d been struck and opened my mouth wide in surprise.
“Then I turned around toward her and she gave me another.”
“So you said what you said, and then you had a crisis of weeping. Then they brought you tea, some coffee, some pastries? When did this happen? If you can be precise,” Luciano asked.
“They brought me things only after I made declarations - depositions” - that Patrick had raped and murdered Meredith, and I had been at the house covering my ears.
“I was there, they were yelling at me, and I only wanted to leave, because I was thinking about my mom, who was arriving soon, and so 1 said, ‘Look, can I please have my phone,’ because I wanted to call my mom. They told me no, and then there was this chaos. They yelled at me. They threatened me. It was only after 1 made declarations that they said, `No, no, no. Don’t worry. We’ll protect you. Come on.’ That’s what happened.
“Before they asked me to make other declarations-1 can’t say what time it was””but at a certain point I asked, ‘Shouldn’t I have a lawyer or not?’ because I didn’t honestly know, because I had seen shows on television that usually when you do these things you have a lawyer, but okay, so should I have one? And at least one of them told me it would be worse for me, because it showed that I didn’t want to collaborate with the police. So I said no.”
Then it was Mignini’s turn. “Why did you say, ‘Patrick’s name was suggested to me, I was beaten, I was put under pressure?”’
As soon as I started to answer, Mignini interrupted with another question. He’d done the same thing to me during my interrogation at the prison. This time, I wasn’t going to let it fluster me. I was going to answer one question at a time. Showing my irritation, I said, “Can I go on?”
I described my November 5 interrogation again. “As the police shouted at me, I squeezed my brain, thinking, ‘What have I forgotten? What have I forgotten?’ The police were saying, `Come on, come on, come on. Do you remember? Do you remember? Do you remember?’ And then boom on my head.” I imitated a slap. “‘Remember!’ the policewoman shouted. And then boom again. ‘Do you remember?”’
When Mignini told me I still hadn’t proved that the police had suggested Patrick’s name, my lawyers jumped up. The exchange was so heated that Judge Massei asked if I wanted to stop.
I said no.
At the end, the judge asked what I thought of as a few inconsequential questions, such as, Did I turn up the heat when I got to the villa that Friday morning? Did we have heat in the bathroom, or was it cold? Rather, the judge was trying to catch me in an inconsistency. Why would I come home to a cold house when I could have showered at Raffaele’s?
Then it was over.
In the past I hadn’t been great at standing up for myself. I was proud that this time was different.
When the hearing ended, I got two minutes to talk to my lawyers before the guards led me out of the courtroom. “I was nervous when you first spoke,” Luciano admitted, “but by the end I was proud of you.”
Carlo said, “Amanda, you nailed it. You came across as a nice, intelligent, sincere girl. You left a good impression.”
I took this to mean that I didn’t come across as “Foxy Knoxy.”
For a while during the trial, the guards would let my parents say hello and good-bye to me in the stairwell just before I left the courthouse for the day. My mom, my dad, Deanna, Aunt Christina, and Uncle Kevin were waiting for me there that day. They hugged me tightly. “We’re so proud of you,” they said.
I hadn’t felt this good since before Meredith was murdered.
After another few days in court, the judge called a two-month summer break.
(2) What The Book Description Omits
I am not expecting a complete trial transcript by any means, but here are some of the numerous vital details conveniently left out.
(a) First, to state the obvious…
(1) AK omits that her book directly contradicts a lot of what was said on the witness stand (okay, that’s not saying much)
(2) AK omits that her book leaves out a lot of what was said on the witness stand (okay, that’s not saying much)
(b) Second who asked the questions
(3) AK omits that she was questioned by Francesco Maresca (Kercher lawyer)
(4) AK omits that she was questioned by Guilia Bongiorno (Sollecito lawyer)
(5) AK omits that she was questioned by Luca Maori (Sollecito lawyer)
(6) AK omits that she was questioned by Giancarlo Massei (Trial Judge)
(7) AK omits that a taped phone call was played (with Filomena Romanelli)
(c) Third, how much makes no sense
(8) AK claims she didn’t expect to be interrogated, but leaves out that she showed up unannounced and uninvited
(9) AK omits telling the Court she doesn’t know how to delete “sent” messages, as she’s not a “technical genius”
(10) AK claims she was asked about “imagining things”, but not about the list she had put together
(11) The same 2 “slaps” are used to: (a) get Knox’s attention; (b) get Knox to remember; (c) get Knox to stop lying; (d) to get Knox to say Meredith had sex; (e) to get Knox to give up a name; (f) to confirm a name. So, I assume she was smacked about 12 or 14 times….
(12) AK knew Meredith screamed, but only because it was suggested to her
(13) AK knew Meredith’s body made a “thud”, but only because it was suggested to her
(14) AK knew about the sexual assault, but only because it was suggested to her
(15) AK knew about Meredith having her throat cut, but only because an anonymous officer told her—or was it gestured?
(16) AK knew Meredith took a long time to die ... because she watches CSI
(17) AK knew about the gurgling sounds Meredith made .... because she watches CSI
(18) AK asked for pen and paper to write that she didn’t know what the truth is
(19) AK tells her Mother PL is innocent, but isn’t sure she didn’t imagine it (and report that)
(20) AK, in the same testimony, imagines both: (a) PL is guilty; and (b) PL is innocent. Well, 1 of those must be true.
(21) AK needs a mop for a little puddle at RS’ home, yet hops around on a bathmat in her own home
(22) AK doesn’t think to flush a toilet that had been used 12+ hours before
(23) AK is asked to imagine things, even though there is all this hard evidence
(24) AK was starved, yet the police still brought her tea “and other things”
(25) AK saying “I can’t lie. I was there” is just a euphemism for screwing with RS. Not an admission of guilt
(26) “Hickies” from boyfriend apparently look like cut marks
(27) AK supposedly had a class project once where she describes the 10 minutes prior to discovering a body
(28) AK doesn’t know Ficarra’s name (her supposed abuser), but does remember it after another 4 years
(29) AK doesn’t clean up blood after seeing it in her bathroom
(30) AK is freaked out by an open door, which she suspects a housemate left while throwing out the garbage
(31) AK doesn’t think its strange that her lamp got locked in Meredith’s room
(32) AK doesn’t remember calling her mother in court, but remembers it fine after another 4 years
(33) AK only knew Meredith a month, and just wants to get on with her life (some “friend”)
(34) AK imagines things that last for years, but this is the only situation where it ever happened
(35) AK “might” have been interrogated by dozens of people. Or it could have been a few, and the faces weren’t familiar
(36) Despite huge amounts of evidence, the police ask Amanda to imagine what could have happened
(37) The police investigative technique of asking witnesses to “imagine things” is only ever applied to AK. Never before. Never afterwards.
(38) AK doesn’t really know what the word “confirm” means
(39) AK has trouble—even years later—distinguishing between imaginary and reality.
Conclusion
To put it mildly, what Knox said previously in court in 2009 does not match up with her book in 2013 and her 2015 addition.
Seems that AK is either: (a) forgive me, but a complete bullshitter, who lies through her teeth as often as breathing; or (b) has an extremely limited grasp of reality, which even Sollecito and others who know her have suggested, coupled with a very poor memory; or (c) a combination of (a) and (b).
This makes it very hard for us to distinguish between what she genuinely can’t remember - psychologists feel she may have blanked out the attack on Meredith - and what are actual new lies.
Not an envious task for any trial court. Judge Massei seems to have had a hard time making any sense of it whatsoever. Judge Nencini hardly bothered.
Series will continue
Archived in Knox Provides Proofs, Explanation
Permalink for this post • Tell-a-Friend • Comments here (15)